<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unwritten &#187; successful</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rosalindonline.com/tag/successful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rosalindonline.com</link>
	<description>Today is where your book begins, the rest is still...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 05:56:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Nightline&#039;s Single Black Female</title>
		<link>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/01/nightlines-single-black-female-3/</link>
		<comments>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/01/nightlines-single-black-female-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosalind</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nightline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single+black+female]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[successful]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosalindonline.com/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The women were silly and the statistics were shaky. Where was the breakdown of ineligible black women? You know, the ones who don&#8217;t have HS diplomas, the jailbirds, the lesbians, and the ones who were otherwise unfit for marriage? If that kind of breakdown had been done, I&#8217;m sure there still would have been more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The women were silly and the statistics were shaky. Where was the breakdown of ineligible black women? You know, the ones who don&#8217;t have HS diplomas, the jailbirds, the lesbians, and the ones who were otherwise unfit for marriage? If that kind of breakdown had been done, I&#8217;m sure there still would have been more women than men fit for marriage, but I doubt the margin would have been as wide.</p>
<p>I think all the attention being given to the &#8220;plight&#8221; of the &#8220;successful&#8221; black woman is a result of what I&#8217;m calling the Michelle Obama effect. She is well liked and respected, and suddenly all black women are no longer lumped under the same stereotyped umbrella: hypersexualized, lazy, electric babymakers. Suddenly, &#8220;America&#8221; (a euphemism for white people) realizes that there are some driven, accomplished black women out here&#8230; and OMG, they&#8217;re not going to have a Barack of their own. THE HORROR! Sigh.</p>
<p><center><object width="320" height="265"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bJGMAhWpDF8&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bJGMAhWpDF8&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/01/nightlines-single-black-female-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
