<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unwritten &#187; Tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rosalindonline.com/category/tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rosalindonline.com</link>
	<description>Today is where your book begins, the rest is still...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:03:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Takumar Bayonet 28mm f2.8 FAIL</title>
		<link>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/07/takumar-bayonet-28mm-f2-8-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/07/takumar-bayonet-28mm-f2-8-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosalind</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aperture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f2.8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Takumar Bayonet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosalindonline.com/?p=500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update: The lens isn&#8217;t really a &#8220;fail&#8221;. It&#8217;s just quirky. I decided to keep it, but I just won&#8217;t try to use it in full manual mode without first adjusting the exposure compensation on my camera. As I said below, when I put my camera in Aperture Priority mode, the photos are fine (aka properly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update:</strong> The lens isn&#8217;t really a &#8220;fail&#8221;. It&#8217;s just quirky. I decided to keep it, but I just won&#8217;t try to use it in full manual mode without first adjusting the exposure compensation on my camera. As I said below, when I put my camera in Aperture Priority mode, the photos are fine (aka properly exposed). So, I&#8217;ll probably just only use this lens in that mode.</p>
<p>&#8230;..<br />
So, I finally got the lens Saturday. But, I had to head out of town at the last minute on Sunday, so I didn&#8217;t get to take any test shots until I got back and recovered from the trip. From looking at the lens, it looks fine. No oil on the aperture blades, no fungus on the glass, no scratches or chips in the glass, and the body was okay, etc. </p>
<p>However, when I put the lens on my K10D and started taking test shots, I noticed that the photos taken with the lens wide open at f2.8 were DARKER than the photos taken stopped down to f5.6. In fact, the f5.6 aperture setting seemed to be this lens&#8217; &#8220;sweet spot&#8221;, as it got the exposure right. The photos taken at f8 through f22 were all supposed to gradually get darker as the aperture got smaller. Looking at the photos in the order taken (from largest to smallest aperture: f2.8, f5.6, f8, f11, f16, f22), the darkening of the photos should have followed an easily detectible progression from brightest/lightest to darkest. That didn&#8217;t happen. </p>
<p>The weird thing is that when I took the camera out of full manual mode and put it in Av mode (aperture priority), the exposure in the shots was balanced correctly. But, if I want to grow my technical skills, I can&#8217;t get into the habit of shooting in Av mode all the time. But, if I only shoot in Av, without understanding how to use manual mode, how would I know what to do if I needed to use full manual mode in a difficult lighting situation? Exactly. I&#8217;ve contacted the seller to arrange a return and refund.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/07/takumar-bayonet-28mm-f2-8-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adventures in Computer Building, Pt. 2</title>
		<link>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/04/adventures-in-computer-building-pt-2/</link>
		<comments>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/04/adventures-in-computer-building-pt-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 22:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosalind</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heatsink/fan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video card]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosalindonline.com/?p=310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is about a week late, as I got really busy, but better late than never&#8230;
So, my first experience with building a computer went well, although I did hit a snag with the first CPU cooler I bought. It attached to the motherboard with plastic pegs that were to be pushed through their corresponding holes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is about a week late, as I got really busy, but better late than never&#8230;</p>
<p>So, my first experience with building a computer went well, although I did hit a snag with the first CPU cooler I bought. It attached to the motherboard with plastic pegs that were to be pushed through their corresponding holes in the motherboard and then twisted to &#8220;lock&#8221;. But, the problem was that the holes in the first motherboard I bought were too small. </p>
<p>I took the motherboard and cooler back to swap them out, and instead of a microATX motherboard, I got a full sized ATX motherboard, and instead of a cooler with push-pin connections, I got one that attached to the motherboard via screwing into a back plate. After I figured out how to properly attach the back plate to the motherboard (the directions were lousy), it was much easier to get the cooler installed.</p>
<h2>The Parts</h2>
<p><strong>CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300</strong><br />
<img src="http://rosalindonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/q8300.jpg" alt="Core 2 Quad Q8300" title="q8300" width="300" height="291" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-313" /></p>
<p><strong>Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3L</strong><br />
<img src="http://rosalindonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/mobo.jpg" alt="Gigabyte EP45-UD3L" title="mobo" width="400" height="311" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-317" /></p>
<p><strong>Hard Drive: 500GB Seagate Barracuda</strong><br />
<img src="http://rosalindonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/hdd.jpg" alt="Seagate Barracuda 500GB Hard Drive" title="hdd" width="281" height="319" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-320" /></p>
<p><strong>Memory: 4GB Crucial Ballistix DDR2 800MHz </strong><br />
<img src="http://rosalindonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ballistix.jpg" alt="Crucial Ballistix 4GB DDR2 800MHz (PC-6400)" title="ballistix" width="300" height="300" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-321" /></p>
<p><strong>CPU Cooler: CoolerMaster Hyper 212 Plus</strong><br />
<img src="http://rosalindonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/coolermaster.jpg" alt="CoolerMaster Hyper 212 Plus" title="coolermaster" width="323" height="400" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-322" /></p>
<p><strong>Power Supply Unit: Antec EarthWatts EA 500</strong><br />
<img src="http://rosalindonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/EA500.jpg" alt="Antec Earthwatts EA500" title="EA500" width="400" height="400" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-323" /></p>
<p><strong>Graphics Card: Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS </strong><br />
<img src="http://rosalindonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/graphics-card.jpg" alt="Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS" title="graphics card" width="400" height="318" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-324" /></p>
<p><strong>Case: Thermaltake V3 Black Edition</strong><br />
<img src="http://rosalindonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ThermaltakeV3.jpg" alt="Thermaltake V3 Black Edition" title="ThermaltakeV3" width="400" height="267" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-325" /></p>
<h2>The Build</h2>
<p>It took longer than I anticipated to get finished, but I&#8217;m very happy with my final product. The computer booted up properly the first time I turned it on. I installed Windows XP Pro without a hitch, and then installed all the drivers without a hitch. The pain in the butt was the 12 quadrillion Microsoft updates that were required. But, in the end, it was worth it. I added to my repertoire of skills, and got a kick from seeing something I put together work the way it&#8217;s supposed to the FIRST time.</p>
<p>Here are a couple of pics of the build process&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Empty Case (aka chassis)</strong><br />
<img src="http://rosalindonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/chassis1.jpg" alt="Empty case" title="chassis1" width="400" height="323" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-335" /></p>
<p><strong>Motherboard, power supply, and DVD burner installed</strong><br />
<img src="http://rosalindonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/chassis2.jpg" alt="Motherboard, power supply, and DVD burner installed" title="chassis2" width="400" height="369" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-336" /></p>
<h2>The End Result</h2>
<p>And, here&#8217;s the end result&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Front View</strong><br />
<img src="http://rosalindonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/frontview.jpg" alt="Front view" title="frontview" width="204" height="400" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-337" /></p>
<p><strong>Side View</strong><br />
<img src="http://rosalindonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/sideview.jpg" alt="Side view" title="sideview" width="400" height="344" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-338" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/04/adventures-in-computer-building-pt-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Posting from my Motorola Cliq XT</title>
		<link>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/03/posting-from-my-motorola-cliq-xt/</link>
		<comments>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/03/posting-from-my-motorola-cliq-xt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 04:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosalind</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cliq XT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosalindonline.com/2010/03/posting-from-my-motorola-cliq-xt/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m using the WordPress for Android app to write this post on my new Motorola Cliq XT. This is very cool! This app can be downloaded from the Android Market app that comes preinstalled on Android phones.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using the WordPress for Android app to write this post on my new Motorola Cliq XT. This is very cool! This app can be downloaded from the Android Market app that comes preinstalled on Android phones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/03/posting-from-my-motorola-cliq-xt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vrrrooom!</title>
		<link>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/02/vrrrooom/</link>
		<comments>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/02/vrrrooom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 11:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosalind</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballistix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crucial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q8300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ram]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosalindonline.com/2010/02/vrrrooom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes you have to take advantage of opportunities when they present themselves. I was recently faced with a situation like this with my computer. I came up on a decent price for a quad core processor and even though my dual core processor worked just fine, sometimes when an opportunity presents itself you have to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes you have to take advantage of opportunities when they present themselves. I was recently faced with a situation like this with my computer. I came up on a decent price for a quad core processor and even though my dual core processor worked just fine, sometimes when an opportunity presents itself you have to take it. And with video encoding and post-processing 10.2 megapixel size photos from my DSLR&#160; being processor intensive activities, I figured it might be time to look into upgrading, with Intel just releasing a new line of processors, causing some of the older processors prices to drop. So, with all my monthly obligations paid, and not knowing when I’d again have an extra few bucks, I took it. And, threw in a RAM upgrade while I was at it.</p>
<p>So now, I’m rocking a quad core computer with 4 GB of premium memory from Crucial (Crucial Ballistix). I upgraded to an Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 CPU. That’s four processors each running at 2.5GHz. Actually, as of a few minutes before I started writing this post, each core began running at 2.7GHz. Yep, I overclocked this bad boy as far as I could get it on the stock heatsink/fan without the CPU temperature getting too high. When I get an “aftermarket” heatsink/fan, I will be able to get over 3GHz per core without running into temperature issues. Overclocking for the first time was kind of nerve-wracking, but it wasn’t hard, especially since I didn’t try to do anything fancy. </p>
<p>When I went into my motherboard’s BIOS, I noticed that both my CPU and RAM were running at lower speeds than their supposedly “stock” settings. That’s called being underclocked, and what’s a trip is that at a whole half a GHz slower than what it was <em>supposed</em> to have been running, my computer was still FAST as lightening, compared to my dual core. At the higher 2.7GHz it’s virtually flying, so I definitely can’t wait to get a new heatsink/fan and max the speed out. That’s going to be freaking insane! <img src='http://rosalindonline.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/02/vrrrooom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preparing your HD Video for YouTube Using Windows Live Movie Maker</title>
		<link>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/02/preparing-your-hd-video-for-youtube-using-windows-live-movie-maker/</link>
		<comments>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/02/preparing-your-hd-video-for-youtube-using-windows-live-movie-maker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 01:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosalind</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos & Video Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encoding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wmv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosalindonline.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For this tutorial, I&#8217;m going to assume that you readers have no money to spend on video editing software, and will be using the software that came free with your computers.
Video Formats
The two most popular video formats are .MOV and .WMV. The .MOV format is native to Mac computers, and iMovie will allow you to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For this tutorial, <strong>I&#8217;m going to assume that you readers have no money to spend on video editing software, and will be using the software that came free with your computers.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Video Formats</strong><br />
The two most popular video formats are .MOV and .WMV. The .MOV format is native to Mac computers, and iMovie will allow you to encode your video to HD. The .WMV format is native to Windows computers, and Windows Live Movie Maker (Windows 7) or Windows Movie Maker (for XP/Vista) will allow you to encode your video to HD.</p>
<p>YouTube prefers the .MOV format because it&#8217;s smaller, but accepts .WMV and some others. The quality of HD in both formats is great. The only time it wouldn&#8217;t be is <strong>if your camcorder or webcam takes crappy video</strong>. You have to put good quality in to get good quality out.</p>
<p><strong>Method</strong><br />
Because I have a PC and not a Mac (sobs loudly <img src='http://rosalindonline.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cry.gif' alt=':cry:' class='wp-smiley' /> ), I used Windows Live Movie Maker to encode/render an example video I made just for this tutorial. The final product is below. But, to show you how I did it, I used a screen recording program to record my steps and my vocal instructions. Because the tutorial video is pretty large, and just under 10 minutes long, I opted for encoding it in the .MOV format over the .WMV format since the former would result in a smaller file size.</p>
<p><strong>Example Video</strong><br />
<p><a href="http://rosalindonline.com/2010/02/preparing-your-hd-video-for-youtube-using-windows-live-movie-maker/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p></p>
<p><strong>Tutorial</strong><br />
<p><a href="http://rosalindonline.com/2010/02/preparing-your-hd-video-for-youtube-using-windows-live-movie-maker/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p></p>
<p>That&#8217;s it! It&#8217;s really not a complicated process. If you have any questions, leave a comment or use my contact form to reach me (see the menu bar).</p>
<p><strong>Download the Custom Video File</strong><br />
If you want to get the 960&#215;720p HD custom video profile (.prx file) to use with Windows Live Movie Maker and Windows Movie Maker (for XP/Vista) <a href="http://rosalindonline.com/downloads/PublishToFile960.zip">click this link to download</a>.</p>
<p><strong>How to Install the Custom Video Profile</strong><br />
Unzip the custom file. If you&#8217;re asked where to unzip the file, navigate to: C:\Program Files\Windows Live\Photo Gallery\Video Profiles and unzip it there. Start WLMM or WMM and it should be listed in the Save Move settings with the other profiles OR in another section called Custom Profiles (or something like that, I forget). Viola! That&#8217;s it. Happy videomaking!</p>
<p>Deuces!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/02/preparing-your-hd-video-for-youtube-using-windows-live-movie-maker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video Blogging</title>
		<link>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/01/video-blogging/</link>
		<comments>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/01/video-blogging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 06:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosalind</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silverlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vlog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosalindonline.com/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I started back video blogging, but yet AGAIN, I don&#8217;t know if YouTube is the right place for me to host my videos. I want to place my vlogs on this blog, but I don&#8217;t want to eat up my storage space by hosting them myself, so that&#8217;s where YouTube comes in. If I don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started back video blogging, but yet AGAIN, I don&#8217;t know if YouTube is the right place for me to host my videos. I want to place my vlogs on this blog, but I don&#8217;t want to eat up my storage space by hosting them myself, so that&#8217;s where YouTube comes in. If I don&#8217;t want my videos accessible by anyone on YouTube, I can make them private, and embed them over here, so that&#8217;s not the issue either. The issue is that unless one is uploading a HD video, the quality of YouTube&#8217;s videos leave much to be desired &#8211; even with their new default high quality encoding.</p>
<p>When I record a video, before it&#8217;s uploaded to YouTube, it has to be encoded. By the time YouTube gets finished re-encoding it for their system, the quality has suffered. So, since I have to encode the videos no matter what I do, I&#8217;m thinking of just quitting YouTube and hosting the videos on my Silverlight hosting account.</p>
<p>I have a 10 gigabyte Silverlight video hosting account provided for free from Microsoft that is sitting unused. I could encode my videos for Silverlight&#8217;s specs and upload them there. The best part is that the Silverlight storage is just storage &#8211; my videos won&#8217;t be re-encoded resulting in a degradation in quality. The end result is SHARP, CLEAR videos of high quality.</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230; I have some thinking to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/01/video-blogging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Blog Does Not Have Multiple Personalities</title>
		<link>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/01/this-blog-does-not-have-multiple-personalities/</link>
		<comments>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/01/this-blog-does-not-have-multiple-personalities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosalind</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[difficulties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosalindonline.com/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This blog ran into a minor technical difficulty, and I had to track the problem down and fix it. My apologies if in the last 10 minutes you witnessed 3-4 rapid design changes. I had to find out if the problem was a design issue or a code issue before I knew where to look [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog ran into a minor technical difficulty, and I had to track the problem down and fix it. My apologies if in the last 10 minutes you witnessed 3-4 rapid design changes. I had to find out if the problem was a design issue or a code issue before I knew where to look to fix it. Sorry for any inconvenience! <img src='http://rosalindonline.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/01/this-blog-does-not-have-multiple-personalities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
