<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unwritten &#187; Relationships</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rosalindonline.com/category/relationships/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rosalindonline.com</link>
	<description>Today is where your book begins, the rest is still...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:03:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>My 2010 Proclamation on Men</title>
		<link>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/01/my-2010-proclamation-on-men/</link>
		<comments>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/01/my-2010-proclamation-on-men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosalind</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosalindonline.com/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t get accused of being an ABW (angry black woman) or BBW (bitter black woman) because I&#8217;m neither. It seems the issue with me is that my standards are &#8220;too high&#8221;. Nevermind that I don&#8217;t have unrealistic standards like height requirements or a list of &#8220;approved&#8221; jobs/careers. I think that to many men, my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get accused of being an ABW (angry black woman) or BBW (bitter black woman) because I&#8217;m neither. It seems the issue with me is that my standards are &#8220;too high&#8221;. Nevermind that I don&#8217;t have unrealistic standards like height requirements or a list of &#8220;approved&#8221; jobs/careers. I think that to many men, my standards are too high simply because I have them.</p>
<p>Many are used to dealing with women with no standards, so they&#8217;ve gotten spoiled and lazy and think that&#8217;s the way it&#8217;s supposed to be. But, the thing is is that men have standards as well, and if a woman doesn&#8217;t meet them, they will NOT give us that same benefit of the doubt they want us to give them. They simply move on to the next one. But, when I do the same thing I&#8217;m wrong. That&#8217;s crazy as hell.</p>
<p>I made up my mind that for 2010 I was just going to do what I do, and not even think about men or relationships too much. I&#8217;m content being single and free, and there&#8217;s nothing wrong with a maintenance man for the time being. <img src='http://rosalindonline.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/01/my-2010-proclamation-on-men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nightline&#039;s Single Black Female</title>
		<link>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/01/nightlines-single-black-female-3/</link>
		<comments>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/01/nightlines-single-black-female-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosalind</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nightline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single+black+female]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[successful]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosalindonline.com/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The women were silly and the statistics were shaky. Where was the breakdown of ineligible black women? You know, the ones who don&#8217;t have HS diplomas, the jailbirds, the lesbians, and the ones who were otherwise unfit for marriage? If that kind of breakdown had been done, I&#8217;m sure there still would have been more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The women were silly and the statistics were shaky. Where was the breakdown of ineligible black women? You know, the ones who don&#8217;t have HS diplomas, the jailbirds, the lesbians, and the ones who were otherwise unfit for marriage? If that kind of breakdown had been done, I&#8217;m sure there still would have been more women than men fit for marriage, but I doubt the margin would have been as wide.</p>
<p>I think all the attention being given to the &#8220;plight&#8221; of the &#8220;successful&#8221; black woman is a result of what I&#8217;m calling the Michelle Obama effect. She is well liked and respected, and suddenly all black women are no longer lumped under the same stereotyped umbrella: hypersexualized, lazy, electric babymakers. Suddenly, &#8220;America&#8221; (a euphemism for white people) realizes that there are some driven, accomplished black women out here&#8230; and OMG, they&#8217;re not going to have a Barack of their own. THE HORROR! Sigh.</p>
<p><center><object width="320" height="265"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bJGMAhWpDF8&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bJGMAhWpDF8&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rosalindonline.com/2010/01/nightlines-single-black-female-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
